✦1:1s

Stop starting 1:1s from scratch

Paceflow pulls together what your engineer has shipped, what you talked about last time, and what you still owe them. You bring the conversation.

Start free See how it works

Free forever for teams up to 7. No card.

Works with the tools your team already uses

JiraLinearClickUpGitHubBitbucketSlack

The prep problem

Most 1:1s go one of two ways. Either you skim Slack for five minutes beforehand and wing it, or you skip prep entirely and the meeting turns into a status update neither of you wanted.

If you're the manager

You know the difference a good 1:1 makes. But the context lives in six places: the sprint board, the PR queue, a Slack thread from three weeks ago, your notes app, last quarter's review doc, and your memory. Reassembling it before every meeting is a job on its own, so most weeks you don't.

If you're the engineer

You've had the 1:1 where your manager asks what you're working on and you spend twenty minutes explaining something they could have looked up. You've mentioned wanting to move toward architecture work twice and heard nothing back. The meeting isn't hostile, it's just not going anywhere.

1:1 context without the scramble

Paceflow keeps the meeting centered on the person, not the status update.

Walk in with the context already there

Recent work, gathered for you.
Merged PRs, closed tickets, and shipped work from Jira, Linear, ClickUp, GitHub, and Bitbucket, collected into one view for the period since you last met.
Last meeting, one scroll up.
What you discussed, what you agreed, what's still open.
Their own notes first.
Your engineer adds their agenda before the meeting, so the conversation starts where they want it to.

Keep the thread between meetings

Shared agenda.
Both of you add items during the week instead of trying to remember them on the call.
Open commitments.
Anything either of you agreed to carries forward until it's done or dropped.
Growth topics that don't evaporate.
Career goals stay pinned to the profile, so "I want to do more design work" gets revisited in March instead of dying in January.

Reviews that write themselves from what already happened

A year of 1:1s, in order.
When review season arrives, the history is there. No archaeology.
Peer feedback in the same place.
Collected as you go, attached to the person, not scattered across forms.
Evidence for the claims you're making.
Promotion cases hold up better when the examples are specific and dated.

Your engineers get their own account, not a shadow profile

Every engineer in Paceflow logs in and sees their own delivery data, their own history, and their own growth record. Not a summary you decided to pass along. The same underlying data you're looking at.

Your engineers see their own stats, trends, and history in full

No score, no rank, no comparison against teammates

1:1 notes are yours to write and yours to share, and Paceflow tells your engineer when you've shared one